social networking - Implementing Community Moderation -
I am building a social network platform as a forum for web development. I have a few questions about how community control should be implemented properly.
Flagging
Should it be fully automated? like. If a post has been marked XX times, will it be closed / deleted?
I think there are some problems, if by any means the group of users has decided to wreak havoc, can they go to flag everything? Surely there are not many users of the community?
A more non-destructive method is hiding the post by default, and users have been clicked to view the flagged posts, until it is removed by trusted moderators. ?
By closing / deleting a post
I think it should be reserved for reliable intermediaries / administrators? Or can this be a lot of work?
How is it implemented in general? Like Forst or Stack Overflow?
This is a difficult balance, but the person marking the post in some form of mechanism on the basis of reputation The proper "One size fits all" solution (example: A "standard" user can affect the score of a post by X, whereas an intermediary can affect Y, an administrator Z, etc. )
That said, I will be tempted to add at least the IP Ed Race logging some form etc. (if it has not been during the flagging stage) If you decide to go for automatic closure in any form. (This should stop at least one form of "group attack".)
In short, whatever administration tools and utilities you can make in the beginning, they will later pay a dividend later. Although this is not relevant in this example (as it is for learning purposes, I am guessing that this will not see significant deployment for some time, if ever) this is a good estimate. Div>
Comments
Post a Comment