performance - How does Node.js perform compared to Apache? -


Does the node with an appointment.JS is faster and more scalable? Node for web application on apache Are there any performance figures to back up JS performance?

UPDATE: OK, my question (above) is misleading because I'm a little angry how nodes.JS sits within the web stack, in what circumstances do I have to use Node instead of traditional stacks like PHP, MySQL and Apache You should consider using .js - or node. Does JS take part in this stack?

node. JS is a framework that is particularly suitable for writing high performance web applications, to understand how to implement concurrency at a lower level. This is a framework for writing server-side JavaScript applications using non-blocked IOs: instead of waiting on the results, keep the IO calls. Node.JS provides a system API (filesystem access, network access, etc.), where all API calls take a continuation that will execute the result later, instead of blocking and returning the result to the original caller.

You can use yourself, if you want but you need a dedicated reverse proxy in front of Node.js: something like Apache, NGN, Lig HTTP, etc., or, to cluster a big app For some running nodes, you will have to see some hyperrox in front of the JS app server.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - sqlDecimal to decimal clr stored procedure Unable to cast object of type 'System.Data.SqlTypes.SqlDecimal' to type 'System.IConvertible' -

Calling GetGUIThreadInfo from Outlook VBA -

Obfuscating Python code? -