c# - Thread Renaming -

-

In Java, it is possible to rename the thread. This is not in .NET. The reason for this is that the name is a property that writes- once in the thread class: 

  public string name {get {return.m_Name; } [Host Protection (Security Action.LinkDemand, ExternalTrading = true)] Set {Lock (this) {if (this.m_name! = Null) {New Invalid Operation Expansion (Environmental GETResourceString ("InvalidOperation_WriteOnce")); } This.m_Name = Value; InformThreadNameChangeEx (this, this.m_Name); Given the fact that Java is allowed to rename the thread and use the built-in thread structure, both the platforms are OS-supplied, I think I can actually change the name in the thread C # I avoid a certain methodology which i) do not care about me or b) do not use at all  
 Do you have any idea why changing the name of a thread once The registration? Any name changes, does any idea break up?  
 I have tried a test where I change the name of the thread:  
  var t1 = new thread (testmistm); T1.Name = "abc"; T1.Start (); T1.GetType (). GetField ("m_Name", BindingFlag.Instance; BindingFlag NonPolic). SetsValue (T1, "DEF"); T1.GetType (). GetMethod ("InformThreadNameChangeEx", BindingFlag NonPolicy | Binding Flags.Static). Invoke (T1, New Object [] {T1, T 1.Name}); The result is that the name has actually been changed and it appears on other codes that use this thread. The background for this is that I need to log into things that thread and the logging library that I use (log4net) uses the thread name, to specify which thread works . thank you in advanced.  
  Edit:  Please stop suggesting the obvious things! I know how to name a thread in the beginning, if I am asking how to rename it.  
 Why do I need to do this, that thread will be used again and it can be used by another component and I show that if and when it is entering Instead of a normal number, there should be a specific thread name.  
 
 
 I analyzed that operation and the only code in that BCL that I saw (or more accurate Nikolaos ) Which uses  thread.name  getter to call for the  RegisterClassEx  API in User32.dll. In the  Thread  class, only the  m_Name  refers to the member in the  name  getter and setter. I suspect that it is safe to rename the thread in the manner you have adopted except that I will change my code to get a lock on the same code that  threads Name  Fortunately this is none other than the  thread  example, so it is easy to do. 
 
  var t1 = New Testament (TestMethod); T1.Name = "abc"; T1.Start (); Lock (T1) {t1.GetType () GetField ("m_Name", BindingFlag.Instance | Compulsive Flag Nonpolic) SetValue (T1, "DEF"); T1.GetType () GetMethod ("InformThreadNameChangeEx", BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Static). Invite (T1, New Object [] {T1, T 1.Name}); } Another thing to note is that you may have problems changing code access protection and private members, depending on which level of application Believe in Obviously this did not come in play with your test, but it is worth mentioning here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - sqlDecimal to decimal clr stored procedure Unable to cast object of type 'System.Data.SqlTypes.SqlDecimal' to type 'System.IConvertible' -

-
I'm new to this I'm writing a clr. stored procedure that can be used to get values ​​used in a calculation Call for another stored procedure for Gives an archived methodology int (I think SqlInt32? Value of the table's value is int) which is then necessary to convert to decimal. Here I have the code: Public static integral mood (SQL MDMMYLUE, escalistering AMY type, out of SQLDCM Result) {aResult = 0; Try {SqlConnection conn = New SqlConnection ("Reference Connection = True"); SqlCommand cmd = New SqlCommand ("sp_GetType", conn); Cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue ("@ myValueType", aMyValueType); Cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; Conn.Open (); Object type = CMD. Exclamation Asser (); Conn.Close (); Decimal type FORCalculation = Convert. ToDecimal (type); Decimal value = convert toDecimal (aMyValue); // ** calculation calc = new calculation (); Decimal result = calorie.docalulation (typefarculation, value); I get an exception...
Read more

Calling GetGUIThreadInfo from Outlook VBA -

-
I need to find the active window'm writing a VBA macro in MS Outlook, which is a specific process. The goal of this is to get the active window / document name even if its original application has more than one document interface. User processor with GetCurrentThreadId is active, I am using GetGUIThreadInfo to get .dll. Here is the correct code: private type RECT as as Left LongPtr top LongPtr right LongPtr down LongPtr termination of private type GUITHREADINFO cbSize as LongPtr flags LongPtr hwndActive LongPtr hwndFocus LongPtr hwndCapture LongPtr as as as as as reset as LongPtr rcCaret as LongPtr hwndCreate as LongPtr hwndMoveSize as HwndMenuOwner end of Private Equity PtrSafe function GetWindowThreadProcessId Lib "user32" (_BVV hnw LongPtr as LongPtr Nig Mr. announced as PtrSafe function GetGUIThreadInfo Lib "user32" _ (ByVal dwthreadid as LongPtr, _ lpguithreadinfo as GUITHREADINFO) LongPtr Sub MyFunction () as dim strWindowTitle string = space as s...
Read more

Obfuscating Python code? -

-
I'm looking for a way to hide my Python source code. print "Hello World!" How can I encode this example so that it is not human-readable? I have been asked to use Base 64 but I'm not sure how. itemprop = "text"> It is limited only, first level ambiguous resolution, but has built-in: byte-code in Python Is a compiler for: dragon-o-m py_compile & lt; Your program.py & gt; creates a .pyo file with a byte-code, and where the docstrings are removed, etc. You can rename .pyo with the .py extension, and python & lt; Your program.py & gt; runs as your program, but it does not have your source code. PS : If your program blur modules like this, you need to rename them with the .pyc suffix (I Not sure it will not break a day), or you can work with .pyo and run them with python -o ... .pyo ( Import should work). This will allow dragon to search your modules (otherwise, Python looks for the .py module).
Read more