css - Tableless html alternative -


Would not anyone use the table to show the following in the layout?

  ______________________________________ | _______ | _____________ | | | _______ | _____________ | _______________ | | _______ | _____________ | | | _______ | _____________ | | | _______ | _____________ | _______________ |  

The third column requires the extension of the first two "rows" and then increase the next three "rows" before the "column" should have the same width

Update: The content of the markup contains checkboxes, text boxes and textwares

Conclusions:

This very educative Used to be. I believe that I have been cleared with this philosophical question.

I think the general rule should be: Do not use tables for your entire website, if there is a class that looks like a table, use the table "Use a table Never seems to be extreme impractical and theoretical. Similarly, excessive use of tables makes maintenance difficult, and handling 4-deep nested tables can be a real pain.

Because because the layout above looks like "table" I am going to use a table. :)

Even if the content is not tabbed, if you need it, then use a table layout Most logic is purely theorems against using a table for (Are you really planning to offer more than one stylesheet for your site, for example? Do you care how your form works? Looks?) Sometimes, especially large A site Eaut issues, tables work better than CSS.

Use what works.

Tables were often misused for layouts, and most of them may end up in favor of a simple CSS layout. But sometimes, tables are better tools


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - sqlDecimal to decimal clr stored procedure Unable to cast object of type 'System.Data.SqlTypes.SqlDecimal' to type 'System.IConvertible' -

Calling GetGUIThreadInfo from Outlook VBA -

Obfuscating Python code? -